Тel. + 38 (044) 270 60 46
Tel. + 38 (050) 719 10 16
Representation of the interests of a private borrower in the Golosiyiskiy district court of the city of Kiev in the proceedings against Ukrsotsbank to discontinue the accrual of interest on a foreign loan at the inflated rate and to set the interest so charged off against the principal. The action was brought in May 2009, and was complicated by the...
In our client’s debtor insolvency lawsuit the total accounts payable constitutes UAH 92 316 513,45. On a basis of our objections Economic court has refused to appoint the person for whom the debtor solicited as the liquidator as there are doubts in her objectivity and disinterest in favor of debtor’s owners. By our solicitation on behalf of the client-...
The Law Office acted for Ukrferrum Company in the Commercial court of the Lugansk Region in proceedings brought by the client against Alchevsk metallurgical complex to recover the debt for slag by-products supplied in 2008-2010. The parties made a settlement but failed to perform it. The court made a judgment in favour of the claimant, and the judgment was...
On a order of Italian company “Genovella LLC” – the developer of real estate projects with implementation of ecological technologies it is executed a legal due-diligence of the enterprise – owner of a building by the area of 1 500,00 sq.m., which is a object of a cultural heritage in Podolsk area of Kyiv. The due-diligence is performed in connection with...
The Law Office acted for “G.E.C” LLC in the Commercial Court of the city of Kyiv in proceedings brought by the Monmart company to declare a contract on wholesale delivery of electro home appliances as void. The buyer had not paid 789 000,00 UAH debt for goods obtained during 2010-2011 and the claim on declaring contract void was submitted for...
We submitted an application for opening of a bankruptcy case to The Commercial Court of Sumska Oblast against our client’s debtor on UAH 3 760 857,10 debt. A debt hasn’t been paid since 31.12.2008 and was being resolved by all the court instances all the time including its new resolution. A debtor is being in winding up proceeding by resolution of its...
The Law Office has acted as a legal adviser of Russian owner of a contact-center regarding conclusion of the contract on recruitment and training of 150 employees for customer’s call-center in Ukraine. With the agreement legal support conditions on the order of recruiting, selection and approval of candidates, mutual ban parties to encourage and hire the...
It’s conducted a partial due diligence of commercial and industrial company “Аpolo” in interests of a client for decision-making on a business acquisition. A legal analysis of the rights and obligations of the company on the basis of financial reporting, primary documents and information from official sources is performed. ...
Proceedings in a claim brought by Verhoeven Holding Uden B.V. (Uden, the Netherlands) seeking to set aside the ruling of the Commercial Court of the Sumy Region to issue a writ of execution in respect of the judgment made by the Permanent arbitration tribunal of the Sumy Region to recover the debt and penalties of 7,238,000 EUR from the client’s debtor in...
The Law Office succeeded in defending claims brought by BMT UA against the State Affairs Management Department, with the State Treasury of Ukraine, Ministry for Health Services of Ukraine as third parties, to collect a debt for medical sterilisation equipment, penalties, inflation rate, and statutory interest of 3,335,702.38 in aggregate. The court found...
The Law Office has acted on a name of Netherlands plaintiff in a court against debtor’s complaint on revocation of open enforcement determination on court decree about loan and percent interest reclamation on EUR 580 000,00. Court decree to the client’s favor was enacted in 2010 and come into legal force in 2011 after court of appeal resolution. Ukrainian...
The Law Office successfully defended Skylock-Ukraine, a Ukrainian operator of GPS vehicle tracking systems, in a court of appeal. The action was brought by IRO LLC claiming 574,067.28 UAH as a payment for allegedly provided advertising services. It was proven in court that the advertising agency had never been commissioned by the client, the advertising...
